Chargers Academy

Progress in Triples -- U.S. Soccer Development Academy

by Mike Woitalla, January 17th, 2013 10:22AM

(Tony Lepore Q&A, Part 1)

The American youth soccer landscape changed dramatically when U.S. Soccer created the Development Academy in 2007.  In Part 1 of our interview with Tony Lepore we asked the Development Academy Director of Scouting to explain how he believes it has improved the youth soccer experience for the USA's elite players.

SOCCER AMERICA: Do you think the Development Academy is on pace to make the positive impact on the U.S. game hoped for when it was launched in 2007?

TONY LEPORE: In general, we feel like we’re making great strides. We’ve always seen this as a long-term process so we want to be critical of ourselves throughout the process. So we still feel like we have a long way to go. But looking back at the major tenants of the philosophy when started the Academy is a really good way to measure progress.

SA: Such as ...

TONY LEPORE: We wanted more training and fewer games. And we’ve really flipped that schedule. In terms of hours, we’ve tripled training in five years.

Before the Development Academy, training was an average of two times a week – so say 3 hours a week, or 12 hours a month. In early Academy we moved that to three times a week. Now it’s four times a week -- 6 to 8 hours a week. Which is closer to a player this age in Italy. Before the Academy, we were training 50 percent less in that comparison. Now we’ve really closed the gap.

That’s significant progress. And we've got a 4-to-1 training to game ratio.

SA: Decreasing the number of games was a key part of the Academy’s aim for elite players ...

TONY LEPORE: We wanted more meaningful games. Fewer games but more meaningful games. Before we started the Academy in 2007, we surveyed the U-15 boys national team. The average was a 100 matches a year. We asked how many were meaningful games. That was around 10.

We’re at an average of 32 games and for the most part the Academy’s games are meaningful.

So meaningful games have tripled.

SA: How about the aim to emphasis development over winning?

TONY LEPORE: We have made progress, especially since Claudio Reyna came aboard [as Youth Technical Director in 2010]. He’s been a really powerful voice

We’ve called people out for having too defensive an approach. We have good competition but with a focus on the style of play.

One measure we always look at is how many younger players do we have playing up. We track it through our database and that has tripled.

Young players playing up can be at the expense of winning games if they’re physically not ready or physically don’t help you. But people are prioritizing that with style of play as well.

This year’s Academy final was a really good example not just for style of play -- the possession play, the attacking approach for both teams -- but for the number of young players in that game. ...

Another important facet of the Academy is adopting international rules ...

SA: No reentry ...

TONY LEPORE: It seems so simple now. No more frantic in and out. Now we have players coming into a national team camp and it’s not something new to play at international rules. How many guys did we have playing on the national team whose first time playing international rules was either when they came into a youth national team or when they went pro? For some it didn’t happen until they were in their 20s.

And thanks to our start rule [25 percent of the games], when clubs take on a player, they invest in his development, which means they get matches. Also, we had a lot of guys who didn’t know how to be a sub when they came into a national team. And we don’t have a lot of overplayed guys at key points in the cycle of the national team.

SA: Another aim of the Academy was removing the pay to play.

We’ve gone from nine to 23 clubs [out of 80] who fully fund their Academy teams. We feel we have a long way to go, but we’re making great strides there.

SA: So would you say the Academy has made youth soccer less expensive?

TONY LEPORE: It’s less expensive because we have more of our elite players playing at no cost than we’ve ever had before in this country.

(Look for Part 2 of our interview with Tony Lepore, in which he addresses the Academy’s ban on high school play and the Academy’s role in identifying national team players.)